Why Competencies?
Competencies are a
critical tool in workforce and succession planning. At a minimum, they
are a means to:
- Identify capabilities,
attitudes, and attributes needed to meet current and future staffing
needs as organizational priorities and strategies shift, and
- Focus employee
development efforts to eliminate the gap between capabilities needed
and those available.
With diminishing resources
and increasing demands, effective development and utilization of human
capital is just as critical to State agencies ' successful delivery of
services as state-of-the-art technology. We need the right people with
the right competencies at the right time, in conjunction with having the
right systems and technology. Agencies want to be more systematic in training
and developing employees. This will ensure that development efforts are
better targeted to meeting agency needs, can be directly linked to results,
and make more efficient use of scarce training resources. "Results" is
the key word. In any enterprise, resources are invested to produce desired
or expected results. In building competency models, we need to identify
competencies that will improve results, making it worth investing in their
development and use.
Definition
of a Competency
How is a competency
different from the knowledge, skills, and abilities (KSAs)
most people are familiar with in our merit system? Competencies encompass
KSAs but also other characteristics
or personal characteristics. Here's
a definition:
A competency
is a characteristic of an employee that contributes to successful job
performance and the achievement of organizational results. These include
knowledge, skills, and abilities plus other characteristics such as
values, motivation, initiative, and self-control.
Civil service exams
are primarily based on the KSAs for a particular job. Other factors or
characteristics also contribute to job performance, as noted in the competency
definition. In the context of the selection process, other relevant personal
characteristics are usually evaluated during the employment interview
and probationary period. KSAs plus other characteristics are
referred to as KSAOs or KSAPs ("P" for personal characteristics).
Generally, a competency can be a KSAO or a combination of KSAOs taken
together. See a discussion on KSAOs and competencies in Competencies
and KSAOs, by James Kierstead, from the Public Service Commission
of Canada http://www.psc-cfp.gc.ca/research/personnel/comp_ksao_e.htm.
The definition and
use of competencies vary from one organization to another. You will need
to adopt a competency approach or framework that works for you. To achieve
the best results, it is important to clearly define and describe the framework
in use for all involved.
Back to Top
Organizational
Competencies
While this report
focuses on individual competencies,
organizations also have
competencies. They are usually the result of collective individual competencies
common throughout the organization. Organizational competencies have significant
impact on organizational results and are worth identifying, if not developing.
Organizational
competencies can include process improvement, teamwork, performance measurement,
values, project management, new ways of thinking or performing, knowledge
management, etc. These are built, in part, on individuals having the competency
or related competencies. For example, an organizational competency of
strategic planning is dependent upon managers having the skills to do
the planning. In addition, the organization needs a workable planning
process, skilled people assigned to coordinate the process, organizational
performance measures, and systems for reporting performance data and tracking
progress in meeting goals and objectives. All of these components could
comprise the organizational competency of strategic planning. (1)
Back to Top
How
Competencies Are Used
New York State government
uses competencies in the following ways:
- Examinations.
Under our State Constitution, laws, federal Uniform Guidelines for Employee
Selection (http://www.uniformguidelines.com/)
and other mandates and standards, examinations must be job-related.
Job-relatedness is achieved by conducting job analyses to determine
the critical KSAOs needed to perform the duties of the position.
An examination
includes a number of components or tests: the minimum qualifications;
the main testing devices and types, such as written, performance and
oral tests and training and experience evaluations; employment interview;
and performance during probation.
- Employee training,
education, and development. Competencies are used in determining and
developing the training, education, and other development opportunities
offered to employees.
Employee training
and development is the primary reason why most agencies invest in competencies,
apart from the exam process. Competencies can be used for broad-based
training and development, focusing on competencies that will be useful
in a wide range of jobs. They can also be used in a more focused way,
within succession planning, to prepare eligible employees for a job anticipated
becoming vacant within a certain period of time.
Because of the competitive
nature of the civil service examination process and the legal requirements
for civil service examinations, the opportunity for training and development
in KSAOs that may be tested in competitive examinations needs to be made
reasonably available to everyone in the promotion field. Likewise, for
the same reasons, while agencies are encouraged to help employees develop
competencies they will need to perform the duties of target positions,
they should not provide training for employees to take specific civil
service examinations.
 |
| *Competencies
for exams and employee development may differ for a given title. |
Although it appears
that we could use the same competencies for employee development and civil
service examinations, this is not necessarily the case. As noted above,
examinations must meet
legal and professional standards of job relatedness, which means that
knowledge, skills, abilities, and other characteristics are identified
and used within this framework. The difference in purpose may dictate
differences in format and content. Certainly, there needs to be consistency
between exam KSAOs and training and development competencies. Competencies
developed for one purpose may provide useful information for other purposes.
In some human resource
systems, competencies are used for many or most of the components of the
system, including employee selection, evaluation, training and development
and even job design and compensation. The various HR subsystems are linked
together by competencies. The Minnesota Department of Transportation began
implementing a competency based system in 1994.
Competencies are not
relevant to classifying jobs in our personnel system. New York
State has a position classification system in which a job is classified
according to the assigned duties and responsibilities, not the competencies
possessed by the incumbent. Though job classification is not based on
competencies, it is logical and appropriate to assign employees to positions
within a title based on their competencies. A job class/title accommodates
some variation in duties and responsibilities, as reflected in different
positions within the class.
Employee evaluations
in New York State government are based on tasks and expectations as specified
in collective bargaining agreements which cover most employees. Evaluations
provide the opportunity for supervisors and employees to identify employee
training and development needs that, if met, could improve performance.
Competencies used in conjunction with the evaluation process can be a
useful tool in identifying training and development needs.
For more information
on using competencies for employee development, see
Section 5: Strategy and Guidelines for
Developing and Using Competencies.
Back to Top
|