![]() |
||||
| A competency
model is a list of competencies, often organized into five
or more groupings or clusters, attributable to satisfactory or exceptional
employee performance for an occupation (e.g. managers, auditors, etc.) or
group of titles. Some agencies refer to these as core competencies. The
model can be used to identify the competencies employees need to develop
to improve performance in their current job (title) or to prepare for other
jobs via promotion or transfer. Employees' competencies would be compared
to the appropriate model to determine where the gaps exist. Individual training
and development plans (IDPs) could then be developed to bridge the gaps.
The development of a competency model involves researching the competencies possessed by successful and/or exceptional incumbents, that lead to achieving performance objectives. The most common approach being used by New York State agencies is to:
The variables to consider in developing a competency model include:
The identification of competencies (a.k.a. KSAOs) for the purpose of developing examinations has traditionally been called "job analysis." There are a variety of job analysis techniques that may be used to identify relevant competencies for selection purposes. See Job Analysis Steps for an example of an approach that may be used for traditional job analysis. You could use some of the same elements for competency modeling for other purposes:
Another technique to consider is the behavioral event interview (or critical incident technique) which is an intensive face-to-face interview that involves soliciting critical incidents from performers and documenting what the performers were thinking, feeling, and doing during the incident. A critical incident is a characteristic and challenging event that embodies the most important aspects of the job. (2) You could also develop behavioral statements to reflect each competency at two or more levels, such as supervisors, mid-level managers, and upper-level managers. Some competencies that apply at one level may not at another. For more information
on available methods for developing competency models, see Chapter 3 in
David Dubois's book Competency-Based
Performance Improvement. Also see how the State
of Michigan developed their competencies for managers and supervisors. A competency-based system is no better than its best component. Following are the competency-based system components:
All four components require attention to achieve positive results, ensure efficient utilization of resources, and yield a high return on investment. If the information on results is faulty or insufficient, the wrong competencies may be in the model. If the model is poorly constructed, the competencies may not accurately link to desired results. You may waste resources developing employees' competencies that are not needed. This could also happen if the method of assessing employees' competencies is inaccurate. Finally, if staff development is not made a priority with sufficient resources committed to it, the development objectives may not be achieved. Employee and supervisor expectations would not be met and the effort would have a negative impact. The key to avoiding these problems is to plan for all four components and scale the effort appropriately. See below for Strategy
and Guidelines for Developing and Using Competencies. |
||||
| Previous Page | ||||
![]() |
||||
![]() |
||||