| Resources
|
| |
| I. |
Use the resources available for Succession Planning.
Some are available from GOER/Civil Service and some are in your
agency. |
| |
1.
|
Civil
Service/GOER's publication - "Our
Workforce Matters" |
| |
2.
|
Your
agency's strategic plan, if it is active |
| |
3.
|
Your
agency's workforce plan submitted to Civil Service |
| |
|
--
|
Points
out single occupant titles. |
| |
|
--
|
Has analysis for retirements and vulnerability. |
| |
4.
|
Your agency's Human Resource office may have other
staffing analyses as well as their workforce plan that could prove
useful for your project. |
| |
| II. |
Use
the resources provided in our listing of links for
competency models and
systems.
|
| |
These
links connect you to other state and federal agencies that have
implemented competency systems. See also the books
and publications on competencies by various experts. You may
also want to consider hiring consultants. This can save you time
and staff resources, but can be quite expensive.
|
| |
| Strategy
and Steps |
| |
|
Each
step in this strategy includes helpful tips to guide you. We hope
these will save you time and effort in establishing a competency-based
approach to staff development.
|
| |
| I. |
Identify
the positions you are establishing competencies for
|
| |
| |
This
step is about determining the scope of your effort. When you roll
out a competency-based program, you need to clearly communicate
the objectives and terminology to engage staff and reduce potential
resistance and stress among employees. Competencies are not about
being "competent" or "incompetent." They are
about assuring that staff possess the right competencies and about
effective allocation of resources.
|
| |
| |
1.
|
Identify
the objectives of your effort in light of your organization's workforce
and succession plans and strategic plan. What positions in your
organization do you plan on establishing competencies for and how
will the competency model(s) be used? While you may decide to do
your entire organization, you should start with your key positions,
titles, title series, or occupations and develop a schedule to add
the others. Some factors to consider in selecting positions is whether
they are: |
| |
|
--
|
Critical
to the mission of the organization. |
| |
|
--
|
Prone
to rapid turnover, and jobs need to be filled to maintain operations. |
| |
| |
2. |
Identify
the resources available for competency development and use. Be
sure that the investment in competencies is consistent with the
resources available for employee development.
|
| |
|
|
| |
3.
|
Develop
a project work plan.
|
| .
|
|
|
|
| II. |
Develop the competency model
|
| |
|
| |
This
step is about developing the competency model. The model consists
of the competencies needed to perform the responsibilities of
the target title, occupation, etc.
|
| |
| |
1. |
Decide whether you want to adopt an existing competency
model, modify an existing model, or develop one from scratch. |
| |
|
|
| |
2. |
Analyze organization level documents like strategic
plans from the perspective of how they might impact the competency
model. For example, you need to be sure the model reflects important
organizational competencies.
The model should also address changes in functions and duties that
will occur as the strategic plan is implemented. |
| |
|
|
| |
3. |
Include competencies for current and future responsibilities.
You can include a future focus by asking your managers and leaders
in program areas if they anticipate changes in the way they do business
in a year or two. For example, you may make a change in the method
of service production or delivery like the recent automation at
the checkout counters at stores where customers scan the items and
cash out and an employee monitors several checkout stations. The
key question here is whether the potential changes will require
different competencies. |
| |
|
|
| |
4. |
Obtain competency models, lists of KSAOs, and other
materials to use in developing your model: |
| |
|
--
|
Existing
models used by other organizations. (See Section
3.) |
| |
|
--
|
Exam
or position description KSAOs or competencies, including the Civil
Service Battery selection device. |
| |
|
--
|
Organization
level documents, like the strategic plan, that communicate organizational
competencies needing to be translated into individual competencies. |
| |
|
--
|
Staff
performance programs. |
| |
|
--
|
Materials
and assistance for sale from vendors. |
| |
|
|
| |
5. |
Identify the outputs and outcomes that result from
applying the model. What are the results that incumbents are expected
to produce? For example, if an employee is expected to negotiate
a contract, identify the characteristics of a successful contract
and ongoing working relationship with the contractor. This can be
done in the process of selecting the competencies in Step 6 or by
drawing on performance measurement data and information. The objective
is to identify the competencies that will lead to the desired results.
|
| |
|
|
| |
6. |
Select competencies for the model by using the best
research method available, given time and other resources available
and the objectives of your effort. Options include a committee of
experts, interviews, focus groups, or surveys. Consider: |
| |
|
--
|
Involving
current incumbents, supervisors of the positions, direct reports,
managers over the function, partners and/or customers. Including
all would be a 360 degree approach. |
| |
|
--
|
Focusing
on competencies exhibited by the best performers, using the behavioral
incident interviewing approach. |
| |
|
|
|
| |
7. |
Determine the relative importance of the competencies
in terms of achieving desired results and decide
whether to include all relevant competencies in the model or only
the ones that most correlate with results. |
| |
|
|
| |
8. |
Consider whether to define different levels of performance
within each competency. You may want to determine desired target
levels for each competency for each job. For example, you may decide
that upper management should have a higher level of the "visionary"
competency than mid-level managers. Therefore, you might identify
four levels of attainment, assigning level four to upper management
and three to mid-level managers. Then you would develop a series
of behaviors or factors to establish the standards for each level.
|
| |
|
|
|
| III. |
Assess
employee competencies (gap analysis)
|
| |
|
| |
Once the competency
models have been identified, you need to determine the extent
to which you have staff available who possess the needed competencies.
You are building the supply pool of staff to replace those leaving
key positions. This is done by performing an analysis of the gap
between the employees' current competencies and the competency
model for the target title, title series, or occupation. The gap
analysis provides the data you will use to identify training and
development resources needed, and make critical resource decisions.
|
| |
|
| |
1. |
Determine
the employees' current competencies relative to the competency
model.
See Washington
State's material on their website.
|
| |
|
--
|
Consider
developing a survey to determine the employees' competency levels.
This could be completed by the employee plus others, using a 360
approach or something somewhat narrower. The questions could consist
of a rating of the level of performance/possession of each of the
competencies in the model for the target occupation or title. Many
vendors have developed survey tools to assist with this process,
which can save you from having to do it all yourself. |
| |
|
--
|
Consider
drawing on data from the performance evaluation process if it is
an effective process. |
| |
|
|
| |
2. |
Conduct
the gap analysis. The employee and supervisor should collaborate
to perform the competency/gap analysis at least annually. The "gaps"
would be the competencies with the lowest scores if you were using
the survey approach. For example, "visioning" could be
a competency needed for upper level managers. If the employee has
difficulty seeing beyond current operations and, therefore, has
difficulty visioning, this is a gap between the employee's competencies
and the model. |
| |
|
|
|
| IV. |
Develop
strategies to address the gaps
|
| |
|
| |
At
this step, use the results of the gap analysis to create a strategy
to address the development needs identified.
|
| |
|
| |
1. |
Identify the needs by individuals as well as by clusters
needing the same or similar development. This will help you sort
out general needs versus less common but important ones, as well
as providing information to help you prioritize the needs. |
| |
|
|
| |
2. |
Develop individual development plans (IDPs) for employees
who want to participate. |
| |
|
--
|
The
IDP will usually be a multi-year plan. A complete IDP will usually
be impossible to address in one year. However, you should determine
some priority order on the competencies that are most important
to address first, balancing that with available resources. |
| |
|
--
|
The
employee and supervisor should collaborate at least annually to
develop/revise the IDP. |
| |
|
--
|
The
IDP would include strategies to develop the weak or missing competencies
from the assessment. The employee and supervisor may identify other
development opportunities to address as well. |
| |
|
--
|
Training
and development activities could include challenging new assignments,
working on special projects, job rotation, being mentored, classroom
training, e-learning, book and journal reading, participation in
professional organizations, etc. |
| |
|
|
| |
3. |
For each employee or group of employees, identify
the resources for addressing development needs. |
| |
|
--
|
These
may be internal or external, and range in price. Keep in mind there
is a price for the use of internal staff, which is staff time taken
from other responsibilities. Include this in your comparison to
the costs of external sources before making your decisions.
|
| |
|
--
|
Don't
limit yourself to in-house resources. Consider partnering with other
parts of your agency or other agencies, which may benefit both organizations. |
| |
|
--
|
Don't
undervalue non-classroom methods like on-the-job training or mentoring.
These development resources often hit home more clearly on the application
of learning and provide the opportunity for dialogue with the more
experienced staff. |
| |
|
|
| |
4. |
Keep
a centralized record of employee competencies. A database that contains
competency profiles for each employee can help you address development
needs and manage the resources much more efficiently. |
| |
|
--
|
Do
your homework. Shop around and talk to the users of products. |
| |
|
--
|
Be sure a system is designed for competencies rather
than training histories. |
| |
|
--
|
Identify IT (information technology) support needed
for either creating or modifying a system plus maintaining it. All
systems need in-house maintenance to some degree, no matter what
vendors may tell you. |
| |
|
--
|
Look for opportunities to partner with
other units in
your organization for
IT support . |
| |
|
--
|
Keep
the system as simple as possible to provide the outputs you desire.
While others may need systems that provide on-line registration
and status reports, a simple spreadsheet may work for you. |
| |
|
|
|
| V. |
Reassess competencies and evaluate return on investment (ROI)
|
| |
|
| |
This step involves reassessing staff competencies
and performance to confirm improvement. Analyzing this information
helps determine if the resources were effectively allocated.
|
| |
|
|
| |
1. |
To
maximize the benefit of resources allocated to staff development,
consider implementing some level of annual Return On Investment
(ROI) analysis. The following includes Kirkpatrick's four analysis
levels plus Phillips' ROI:
|
| |
|
|
Level
1: Were participants satisfied with their training?
|
| |
|
|
Level
2: Did learning occur and were new competencies developed?
|
| |
|
|
Level
3: Did participants exhibit new behaviors?
|
| |
|
|
Level
4: Did participants create beneficial results from their behavior?
|
| |
|
|
Level
5: Did participants create a monetary return on the investment?
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
--
|
ROI=
Gain (program benefit) minus the program cost divided by the cost,
times 100 [ROI=(G-C)/Cx100].
|
| |
|
--
|
Example:
$221,850 Gain (Agency cost savings, increased productivity and/or
increased revenue)
Minus $61,886 Cost (For trainer, supplies, facilities,
participant salaries for time expended, etc.)
=$159,964 Net Gain
Divided by $61,886
=2.58
Times 100 (to make it percent)
=258% ROI
(5)
|
| |
|
Utilize
agency training and development staff and GOER as a resource as
well as consultants on contract through GOER.
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
2. |
Collect
a wide range of data to determine how well the competency program
is working. Ways to collect evaluation information include periodic
discussions with managers, assessing impact on performance measures,
conducting an environmental scan, and implementing levels 1-5
ROI tools. These can be used to assess the effectiveness and efficiency
of the overall development effort as well as each training resource.
|
| |
|
|