Skip to main content

The Empire Plan is a unique health insurance plan designed especially for public employees in New York State. Empire Plan benefits include inpatient and outpatient hospital coverage, medical/surgical coverage, Centers of Excellence for transplants, infertility and cancer, home care services, equipment and supplies, mental health and substance abuse coverage and prescription drug coverage.

State Seal
GEORGE C. SINNOTT
COMMISSIONER
STATE OF NEW YORK
DEPARTMENT OF CIVIL SERVICE
ALBANY, NEW YORK 12239
www.cs.ny.gov
DANIEL E. WALL
EXECUTIVE
DEPUTY COMISSIONER

PA99-11

TO: Participating Agency Health Benefits Administrators
FROM: The Employee Benefits Division
SUBJECT: Empire Plan Quarterly Experience Report
DATE: September 20, 1999

Enclosed are the Second Quarter Empire Plan Experience Report for 1999 and the cover letter to Chief Executive Officers.

This report provides projected 1999 experience and projected premium rates for the year 2000.


September 20, 1999

Dear Chief Executive Officer:

Attached is the Participating Agency Second Quarter Report for 1999. This report provides projected 1999 Empire Plan experience based on claims paid through June, 1999 and projected 2000 premium rates.

The Empire Plan carriers project a combined surplus of $2.2 million or 0.1% of premium. The report includes details for each of the carriers and, as in the past, these projections will be revised in the next quarterly report based on actual claims experience for 1999.

The 2000 premium projections are included in Exhibit II. These projections reflect increases of approximately 12.0% in the gross rates and 17.2% in the net rates. The report explains the basis for these initial projections and future reports will include revisions based on actual claims data available.

The Keeping You Informed Section of the report includes an update on NYBEAS, the New York Benefits Eligibility and Accounting System, which will be implemented for Participating Agencies by Fall 1999. The information on transmission of reports via E-mail is also included. If you are interested in using this technology to receive future reports, please complete and return the form on Attachment 1.

According to a national survey, the ten most heavily advertised drugs accounted for 22% of the total increase in drug spending over the last five years. In NYSHIP's Empire Plan, 20% of the increase in drug spending between 1997 and 1998 was from nine of the top ten most heavily advertised drugs. The Keeping You Informed Section provides additional details on this drug spending analysis.

I hope this report is informative and useful to you. If you have any questions, comments or suggestions, please don't hesitate to contact me.

Sincerely,

Robert W. DuBois, CEBS
Director
Employee Benefits Division


PARTICIPATING AGENCIES

EMPIRE PLAN
1999 Second Quarter
Experience Report

Prepared by The State of New York
Department of Civil Service

 

EMPIRE PLAN EXPERIENCE REPORT
APRIL - JUNE 1999
Produced for
PARTICIPATING AGENCIES IN THE
NEW YORK STATE
HEALTH INSURANCE PROGRAM
by
the Employee Benefits Division
New York State Department of Civil Service
George C. Sinnott
President, New York State Civil Service Commission

Projected 1999 Empire Plan Experience

Projected 2000 Premium Rates

Keeping You Informed

Attachment 1 - Transmission of Reports Electronically

Exhibits

I 1999 Projected Empire Plan Experience

II Empire Plan PA Projected Premium Rates

III Empire Plan PA Group Rates (1985-2000)

IV Empire Plan PA 5 Tier Group Rates (1995-2000)

 

NYS HEALTH INSURANCE PROGRAM
PARTICIPATING AGENCY GROUP
EMPIRE PLAN EXPERIENCE REPORT
2ND QUARTER REPORT

PROJECTED 1999 EMPIRE PLAN EXPERIENCE

Based on claims paid through June 30, 1999, the Empire Plan carriers project a composite dividend of $2.2 million (0.1% of premium), or $34.5 million less than the margin loaded in the 1999 rates. The 1999 annual experience projected by the insurance carriers is reported in Exhibit I with individual carrier projections explained as follows:

Blue Cross

Blue Cross projects a 1999 gain of $26.9 million (4.2% of premium). This is $11.4 million more than the margin loaded in the 1999 rates and is primarily attributable to a lower 1998 claims base than was used in the 1999 rate development.

United Healthcare Medical

United HealthCare projects a composite 1999 dividend of $8.7 million (1.0% of premium) representing an $11.0 million decrease over the margin loaded in the 1999 rates. There are no material variances in the quarterly estimates and those made at renewal.

Group Health Incorporated Mental Health and Substance Abuse Program

Group Health Incorporated projects a 1999 surplifis of$1.3 million (2.0% of premium) for the Mental Health and Substance Abuse (MHSA) Program, or $278,000 less than the margin loaded in the 1999 rates. There are no material variances in the quarterly estimates and those made at renewal.

Cigna

A 1999 loss of $34.7 million representing 8.1% of premium is projected by Cigna. This loss is primarily attributable to an increase in prescription drug trends over the last two years from 15% to approximately 20%.

PROJECTED 2000 PREMIUM RATES

Exhibit II presents the projected 2000 Empire Plan gross and net premium assuming the application of $69.5 million in dividend to all payors. The Empire Plan gross premium is projected to increase approximately 12.0% with anet premium increase of 17.2%. The higher rate increase of net premium in relation to the increase in the gross premium reflects the decreased level of available dividend to be applied in 2000 as compared to 1999. While final rates will not be established until later this year, we expect that they will be within the range presented in Exhibit II.

For comparison purposes. Exhibit III presents the individual and family rate history for the Core Plus Medical and Psychiatric Enhancements option based on the Two Tier Empire Plan rate structure in effect prior to January 1, 1996, while Exhibit IV presents the five tier history from 1996 to 2000.

KEEPING YOU INFORMED

NYBEAS (New York Benefits Eligibility and Accounting System)

The Employee Benefits Division is in the process of converting the NYSHIP eligibility and accounting systems into one system called NYBEAS which will be implemented for Participating Agencies by Fall of 1999. Please note that the cut-off date for processing transactions through the current enrollment system is October 25, 1999. The start-up date for processing transactions through NYBEAS is November 15, 1999. During this three week period, it will not be possible to process any transactions.

Training sessions have been scheduled beginning September 27, 1999, for agencies that submit more than 100 transactions per year and for smaller agencies that are equipped and interested in using NYBEAS. Agencies not equipped to use NYBEAS will submit paper transactions to the Employee Benefits Division.

We will keep you informed of our progess in implementing NYBEAS.

Transmission of Reports Electronically

The Employee Benefits Division has the capability to transmit the Participating Agency Quarterly Experience Report via E-mail. Using a software product called Adobe Acrobat Readera??, the PA Quarterly Report is converted into portable document format (PDF). This is a format that can be read by any recipient, if they have Adobe Acrobat Readera?? installed on their system. Adobe Acrobat Readera?? is available free from the Internet. For your reference, Attachment 2 includes the instructions on how to obtain Adobe Acrobat Readera??. There are many advantages to receiving the reports electronically including: reports will be received sooner; there will be less paper to handle; and the reports can be stored electronically and/or a hard copy may be printed.

If you would like to receive the report electronically, please provide your E-mail address by completing the bottom section of Attachment 1 and returning it to the Employee Benefits Division.

Impact of Advertising on the Empire Plan's Prescription Drug Program

An analysis of the Empire Plan's Prescription Drug Program spending between 1997 and 1998 shows an increase of $43.3 million. Of this increase, $8.5 million (or 20%) was for nine of the top ten most heavily advertised "Direct to Consumers" medications. These include Claritin, Zyrtec, Allegra, Pravachol, Zocor, Prilosec, Prozac, Zyban and Evista. The tenth medication is Propecia which is not covered under the Empire Plan since it is used for cosmetic purposes.

Two other highly advertised drugs, Lipitor and Viagra, account for a significant portion of Empire Plan drug spending. Lipitor moved from 13th in 1997 to 2nd in 1998 in terms oftotal drug a costs for the Plan. Although Viagra was introduced in June 1998, it still accounted for 4% of the total increase in drug spending.

Combining the top nine medications noted above with Lipitor and Viagra, the total drug ^ spending increase for the Empire Plan was $17.8 million which represents 41%of the total increase for 1998. If other heavily advertised drugs, such as Lamisil, were included in the analysis, the percentage would be even higher.

Since "Direct to Consumers" advertising has almost doubled over the last two years, it is anticipated that the increases in drug spending attributable to this advertising will continue at a high level.

NYSHIP Representation at Municipal Events

NYSHIP's Empire Plan was represented at the 1999 Fall Seminar sponsored by the NYS Association of Counties on September 13-15, 1999, in Lake Placid and the 1999 Fall Training School co-sponsored by the NYS Conference of Mayors and Office of the State Comptroller on September 13-17, 1999, in Ellenville.

Name and Address Changes

Please be sure to notify the Employee Benefits Division of any changes so that we may keep our mailing lists up-to-date. This updated information may be sent to:

Mr. Stephen Kavanaugh
Assistant Director
Employee Benefits Division
NYS Department of Civil Service
State Office Building Campus
Building #1, Rm. 159
Albany, New York 12239

TRANSMISSION OF REPORTS ELECTRONICALLY

Instructions to read PDF files using ADOBE ACROBAT READER a??

What is PDF?

It is a file format compatible with many different computers and printers. Adobe Acrobat
Readera?? comes in versions that run in DOS, Windows, Mac, UNIX and OS/2. Be sure to
download the correct version. Their page contains download instructions.

Disclaimer

The Department of Civil Service is not responsible for Adobe Acrobat Readera?? or your
use of it. The information provided herein is provided for your convenience and does not in any
way constitute an endorsement of this software product or company.

To Download

Go to Adobe Systems Web Page at:

http://www.adobe.com/supportservice/custsupport/download.html

Follow instructions for downloading under:

Acrobat Reader Macintosh Windows DOS UNIX OS/2

If you would like to receive the report electronically, please complete this form and return it to:

Mr. Stephen Kavanaugh
Assistant Director
Employee Benefits Division
NYS Department of Civil Service
State Office Campus, Building #1
Albany, New York 12239

Agency Code:
Agency Name:
Contact Person:
E-mail Address:


Exhibit I

1999 PROJECTED EMPIRE PLAN EXPERIENCE
In (000's)

  BLUE CROSS UNITED HEALTHCARE MEDICAL Core UNITED HEALTHCARE MEDICAL NY Enhancement UNITED HEALTHCARE MEDICAL PA Enhancement UNITED HEALTHCARE MEDICAL Combined GHI MHSA Core GHI MHSA NY Enhancement GHI MHSA PA Enhancement GHI MHSA Combined CIGNA TOTAL
Premium (1) 641,992 693,304 88,719 74,464 856,487 54,319 6,226 5,038 65,583 428,238 1,992.300
Incurred Claims (2) 581,035 606,093 84,265 60,978 751,336 43,276 4,887 4,014 52,177 450,375 L834.923
Administrative Expense (3) 34,056 78,781 10,028 7,649 96,458 10,015 1,148 928 12,091 12,557 155,162
Gain/(Loss) (A-B-C) 26,901 8,430 (5,574) 5,837 8,693 1,028 191 96 1,315 (34,694) 2,215

(1) Earned Premium - Premium which pays for coverage for the period reported (accrual basis).
(2) Incurred Claims - Represents the cost of covered services provided during the period reported by the insurance company (accrual basis).
(3) Administrative Expenses - All charges by the insurance carrier other than for the payment of claims.
Includes carrier's cost to administer the program, interest charges, and other retention.

Source: 1999 2nd Quarter Report

 

Exhibit II

EMPIRE PLAN
Participating Agency Premium Rates
Comparison of 1999 and Projected 2000 Rates

CORE ONLY

Plan Prime:

Monthly Gross Premium Rates (1)
1999

Monthly Gross Premium Rates (1)
2000

Monthly Gross Premium Rates (1)
% Change

Monthly Net Premium Rates (2)
1999

Monthly Net Premium Rates (2)
2000

Monthly Net Premium Rates (2)
% Change

Individual Optimistic

247.05 267.45 8.3% 233.20 261.67 12.2%
Individual Best Estimate 247.05 275.13 11.4% 233.20 269.35 15.5%

Individual Pessimistic

247.05 283.56 14.8% 233.20 277.78 19.1%
Family - Optimistic 247.05 548.88 8.2% 476.31 537.04 12.8%
Family - Best Estimate 247.05 564.80 11.3% 476.31 552.96 16.1%

Family - Pessimistic

247.05 582.29 14.8% 476.31 570.45 19.8%

 

MediPrime:

Monthly Gross Premium Rates (1)
1999

Monthly Gross Premium Rates (1)
2000

Monthly Gross Premium Rates (1)
% Change

Monthly Net Premium Rates (2)
1999

Monthly Net Premium Rates (2)
2000

Monthly Net Premium Rates (2)
% Change

Individual Optimistic

178.22 209.70 17.7% 169.33 206.33 21.9%
Individual Best Estimate 178.22 212.99 19.5% 169.33 209.62 23.8%

Individual Pessimistic

178.22 216.82 21.7% 169.33 213.45 26.1%
Family 1 - Optimistic 439.33 491.92 12.0% 413.18 482.47 16.8%
Family 1 - Best Estimate 439.33 503.46 14.6% 413.18 494.01 19.6%

Family 1 - Pessimistic

439.33 516.35 17.5% 413.18 506.90 22.7%
Family 2 - Optimistic 369.71 433.30 17.2% 348.51 426.24 22.3%
Family 2 - Best Estimate 369.71 440.48 19.1% 348.51 433.42 24.4%

Family 2 - Pessimistic

369.71 448.74 21.4% 348.51 441.68 26.7%

 

EMPIRE PLAN
Participating Agency Premium Rates
Comparison of 1999 and Projected 2000 Rates

CORE PLUS MEDICAL ENHANCEMENT

Plan Prime:

Monthly Gross Premium Rates (1)
1999

Monthly Gross Premium Rates (1)
2000

Monthly Gross Premium Rates (1)
% Change

Monthly Net Premium Rates (2)
1999

Monthly Net Premium Rates (2)
2000

Monthly Net Premium Rates (2)
% Change

Individual Optimistic

277.67 298.03 7.3% 260.48 289.41 11.1%
Individual Best Estimate 277.67 307.32 10.7% 260.48 298.70 14.7%

Individual Pessimistic

277.67 317.36 14.3% 260.48 308.74 18.5%
Family - Optimistic 568.84 610.22 7.3% 530.54 592.71 11.7%
Family - Best Estimate 568.84 629.37 10.6% 530.54 611.86 15.3%

Family - Pessimistic

568.84 650.09 14.3% 530.54 632.58 19.2%

 

MediPrime:

Monthly Gross Premium Rates (1)
1999

Monthly Gross Premium Rates (1)
2000

Monthly Gross Premium Rates (1)
% Change

Monthly Net Premium Rates (2)
1999

Monthly Net Premium Rates (2)
2000

Monthly Net Premium Rates (2)
% Change

Individual Optimistic

186.36 217.83 16.9% 175.61 213.85 21.8%
Individual Best Estimate 186.36 221.54 18.9% 175.61 217.56 23.9%

Individual Pessimistic

186.36 225.80 21.2% 175.61 221.82 26.3%
Family 1 - Optimistic 478.26 530.80 11.0% 446.33 517.91 16.0%
Family 1 - Best Estimate 478.26 544.39 13.8% 446.33 531.50 19.1%

Family 1 - Pessimistic

478.26 559.32 16.9% 446.33 546.43 22.4%
Family 2 - Optimistic 386.15 449.72 16.5% 360.73 441.47 22.4%
Family 2 - Best Estimate 386.15 457.77 18.5% 360.73 449.52 24.6%

Family 2 - Pessimistic

386.15 466.89 20.9% 360.73 458.64 27.1%

 

EMPIRE PLAN
Participating Agency Premium Rates
Comparison of 1999 and Projected 2000 Rates

CORE PLUS MEDICAL & PSYCHIATRIC ENHANCEMENTS

Plan Prime:

Monthly Gross Premium Rates (1)
1999

Monthly Gross Premium Rates (1)
2000

Monthly Gross Premium Rates (1)
% Change

Monthly Net Premium Rates (2)
1999

Monthly Net Premium Rates (2)
2000

Monthly Net Premium Rates (2)
% Change

Individual Optimistic

279.56 299.88 7.3% 261.18 290.88 11.4%
Individual Best Estimate 279.56 309.17 10.6% 261.18 300.17 14.9%

Individual Pessimistic

279.56 319.41 14.3% 261.18 310.41 18.8%
Family - Optimistic 573.33 614.60 7.2% 531.89 596.23 12.1%
Family - Best Estimate 573.33 633.76 10.5% 531.89 615.39 15.7%

Family - Pessimistic

573.33 654.94 14.2% 531.89 636.57 19.7%

 

MediPrime:

Monthly Gross Premium Rates (1)
1999

Monthly Gross Premium Rates (1)
2000

Monthly Gross Premium Rates (1)
% Change

Monthly Net Premium Rates (2)
1999

Monthly Net Premium Rates (2)
2000

Monthly Net Premium Rates (2)
% Change

Individual Optimistic

186.46 217.93 16.9% 175.61 213.94 21.8%
Individual Best Estimate 186.46 221.64 18.9% 175.61 217.65 23.9%

Individual Pessimistic

186.46 225.91 21.2% 175.61 221.92 26.4%
Family 1 - Optimistic 480.95 533.43 10.9% 447.05 520.04 16.3%
Family 1 - Best Estimate 480.95 547.02 13.7% 447.05 533.63 19.4%

Family 1 - Pessimistic

480.95 562.23 16.9% 447.05 548.84 22.8%
Family 2 - Optimistic 387.05 450.59 16.4% 360.66 442.19 22.6%
Family 2 - Best Estimate 387.05 458.65 18.5% 360.66 450.25 24.8%

Family 2 - Pessimistic

387.05 467.86 20.9% 360.66 459.46 27.4%

 

Exhibit III

EMPIRE PLAN
PA 2 TIER GROUP RATES
2003-2012 Monthly Rates
(For Illustrative Purposes Only)

Core plus Med & Psych. Enh.

Individual

Year Gross Rate (1) % Change Net Rate (2) % Change
1985* 95.71   92.85  
1986 91.97 -3.9% 91.49 -1.5%
1987 103.14 12.1% 101.65 11.1%
1988 (1) 142.01 37.7% 141.52 39.2%
1989 168.72 18.8% 168.05 18.7%
1990 (2) 179.50 6.4% 167.09 -0.6%
1991 (3) 202.09 12.6% 185.09 10.8%
1992 198.85 -1.6% 181.81 -1.8%
1993 214.30 7.8% 194.64 7.1%
1994 213.83 -0.2% 197.39 1.4%
1995 214.70 0.4% 193.54 -2.0%
1996 (4) 219.20 2.1% 192.27 -0.7%
1997 219.87 0.3% 198.37 3.2%
1998 227.35 3.4% 204.38 3.0%
1999 239.24 5.2% 222.00 8.6%
2000 projected 268.57 12.3% 261.40 17.7%

Average Percent Increase

Gross Rate % Change Net Rate % Change
From Inception 7.6% 7.6%
Most Recent 10 Years 4.2% 4.7%
Most Recent 5 Years 4.7% 6.4%

Family

Year Gross Rate (1) % Change Net Rate (2) % Change
1985 203.97   197.57  
1986 195.31 -4.2% 194.30 -1.7%
1987 222.39 13.9% 219.20 12.8%
1988 (1) 324.13 45.7% 323.06 47.4%
1989 383.42 18.3% 381.95 18.2%
1990 (2) 403.75 5.3% 380.15 -0.5%
1991 (3) 464.39 15.0% 417.36 9.8%
1992 445.64 -4.0% 407.76 -2.3%
1993 479.37 7.6% 426.35 4.6%
1994 484.69 1.1% 446.94 4.8%
1995 486.99 0.5% 440.35 -1.5%
1996 (4) 491.07 0.8% 428.27 -2.7%
1997 495.81 1.0% 447.22 4.4%
1998 514.28 3.7% 463.62 3.7%
1999 539.14 4.8% 499.75 7.8%
2000 projected 602.91 11.8% 586.58 17.4%

Average Percent Increase

Gross Rate % Change Net Rate % Change
From Inception 8.1% 8.1%
Most Recent 10 Years 4.2% 4.6%
Most Recent 5 Years 4.4% 6.1%

* Statewide Plan Premium Rates
(1) 1988 rates represent the effect ve amounts of the 1/88 and 8/88 rate changes.
(2) No chanA?e in effective net rate over 1989.
(3) Represents rates effective 1/1/91 - 6.G0/91
(4) Represents 2 tier Empire Plan Rates; 5 tier rate schedule effective 1/1/96

 

Exhibit IV

 

EMPIRE PLAN
PA 5 TIER GROUP RATES
1995 - 2000 Monthly Rates

Core plus Med & Psych. Enh.

Individual Planprime

Year Gross Rate (1) % Change Net Rate (2) % Change
1995 214.70   193.54  
1996 (3) 234.59 9.3% 207.66 7.3%
1997 261.80 11.6% 240.22 15.7%
1998 267.89 2.3% 246.07 2.4%
1999 279.56 4.4% 261.18 6.1%
2000 projected 309.17 10.6% 300.17 14.9%

Average Percent Increase

Gross Rate % Change Net Rate % Change
From Inception of 5 Tier Structure 7.6% 9.3%

Family Planprime

Year Gross Rate (1) % Change Net Rate (2) % Change
1995 486.99   440.35  
1996 (3) 521.96 7.2% 459.16 4.3%
1997 537.96 3.1% 489.22 6.5%
1998 552.00 2.6% 503.78 3.0%
1999 573.33 3.9% 531.89 5.6%
2000 projected 633.76 10.5% 615.39 15.7%

Average Percent Increase

Gross Rate % Change Net Rate % Change
From Inception of 5 Tier Structure 5.5% 7.0%

Individual Medprime

Year Gross Rate (1) % Change Net Rate (2) % Change
1995 214.70   193.54  
1996 (3) 158.65 -26.1% 131.72 -31.9%
1997 150.53 -5.1% 129.28 -1:9%
1998 167.91 11.5% 151.34 17.1%
1999 186.46 11.0% 175.61 16.0%
2000 projected 221.64 18.9% 217.65 23.9%

Average Percent Increase

Gross Rate % Change Net Rate % Change
From Inception of 5 Tier Structure 2.0% 4.6%

Family - 1 Medprime

Year Gross Rate (1) % Change Net Rate (2) % Change
1995 486.99   440.35  
1996 (3) 446.03 -8.4% 383.23 -13.0%
1997 427.23 -4.2% 378.82 -1.2%
1998 452.73 6.0% 409.76 8.2%
1999 480.95 6.2% 447.05 9.1%
2000 projected 547.02 13.7% 533.63 19.4%

Average Percent Increase

Gross Rate % Change Net Rate % Change
From Inception of 5 Tier Structure 2.7% 4.5%

Family - 2 or More Medprime

Year Gross Rate (1) % Change Net Rate (2) % Change
1995 486.99   440.35  
1996 (3) 369.87 -24.0% 307.07 -30.3%
1997 315.24 -14.8% 267.15 -13.0%
1998 351.98 117% 314.25 17.6%
1999 387 05 10.0% 360.66 14.8%
2000 projected 458.65 18.5% 450.25 24.8%

Average Percent Increase

Gross Rate % Change Net Rate % Change
From Inception of 5 Tier Structure 0.3% 2.8%

(1) Represents premiums charged by the carriers
(2) Represents cost to a participating agcnc
(3) Inception of Medprime Rate Structure