The Empire Plan is a unique health insurance plan designed especially for public employees in New York State. Empire Plan benefits include inpatient and outpatient hospital coverage, medical/surgical coverage, Centers of Excellence for transplants, infertility and cancer, home care services, equipment and supplies, mental health and substance abuse coverage and prescription drug coverage.

GOVERNOR
DEPARTMENT OF CIVIL SERVICE
ALBANY, NEW YORK 12239
www.cs.ny.gov
COMMISSIONER
PA10-02
PAEX10-02
TO: Participating Agency Health Benefit Administrators
FROM: Robert W. DuBois, Director of the Employee Benefits Division
SUBJECT: Empire Plan Quarterly Experience Report
DATE: January 29, 2010
Enclosed is the Third Quarter Empire Plan Experience Report for 2009
and the cover letter to the Chief Executive Officers. This report presents the projected 2009 Empire Plan experience and the approved 2010 premium rates.
January 29, 2010
Dear Chief Executive Officer:
Attached is the Empire Plan Third Quarter Experience Report for 2009. This report presents the projected 2009 Empire Plan experience, based on claims paid through September 30, 2009, and the approved 2010 premium rates.
The Empire Plan carriers project a 2009 net dividend of $83.8 million, 1.5% of premium. This report presents the basis for these projections and future reports will include revised projections based on additional claims experience.
The approved 2010 premium rates are presented in Exhibit II and reflect a net premium increase of 3.36% for The Empire Plan and a net premium increase of 3.8% for The Excelsior Plan. Given the fiscal challenges currently faced by the State and its localities, our goal was to develop 2010 NYSHIP rates that are as low as possible to address the need for immediate rate relief for all payors. To accomplish this goal, we aggressively negotiated premium reductions with the insurers which included the use of retrospective premium agreements and applied $410 million in dividend as credit to the premium rates. Given these low net rate increases for 2010, which follows the historically low rate increase of 1.2% for 2009, we expect that the 2011 rate increases will track more closely with actual Plan trend. It is too early to accurately predict the 2011 premium rate change with any degree of certainty. As more data becomes available we will provide projections in subsequent reports.
I hope this report is informative. If you have any questions, comments or suggestions, please don’t hesitate to contact me.
Sincerely,
Robert W. DuBois, CEBS
Director
Employee Benefits Division
EMPIRE PLAN EXPERIENCE REPORT
THIRD QUARTER 2009
Produced for
PARTICIPATING AGENCIES IN THE
NEW YORK STATE
HEALTH INSURANCE PROGRAM
by
the Employee Benefits Division
New York State Department of Civil Service
Nancy G. Groenwegen
President, New York State Civil Service Commission
Exhibits
I. Projected 2009 Empire Plan Experience
II. Projected 2010 PA Premium Rates
III. Empire Plan PA 5-Tier Group Rates (2001-2010)
IV. Empire Plan PA 2-Tier Group Rates (2001-2010)
PROJECTED 2009 EMPIRE PLAN EXPERIENCE
The Empire Plan carriers project that the 2009 premiums, which included no margin, will generate a composite dividend of $83.8 million (1.5% of premium). The 2009 annual experience projected by the insurance carriers is reported in Exhibit I.
This projection is based on only nine months of 2009 paid claim data. The following chart presents the percentage of the projected incurred claims actually paid and the current 2009 trend as compared to the trend assumed during the 2009 premium rate development:
% of Paid Claims to Projected Incurred Claims |
Projected 2009 Trend | |||
2008
|
2009
|
@ Final Renewal
|
@ 3rd Quarter
|
|
---|---|---|---|---|
Blue Cross Hospital | 99.4% | 63.2% | 11.5% | 11.3% |
UHC Medical | 99.8% | 65.9% | 7.5% | 7.9% |
MHSA | 98.3% | 58.2% | 9.2% | 13.5% |
UHC Rx | 99.9% | 69.9% | 9.0% | 6.6% |
The 2009 projected dividend for each carrier as compared to the margin level used in the 2009 premium development is as follows:
Margin
|
2009 Projected
Dividend/(Loss) |
Increase/(Decrease)
over margin |
|
---|---|---|---|
Blue Cross Hospital | $0 | $35,935,000 | $35,935,000 |
UHC Medical | $0 | ($2,746,000) | ($2,746,000) |
UHC MHSA | $0 | ($8,564,000) | ($8,564,000) |
UHC Rx | $0 | $59,162,000 | $59,162,000 |
Total | $0 | $83,787,000 | $83,787,000 |
The increase in the dividend projection is primarily attributable to the decrease in the 2008 claims base for the hospital program projected during the development of the 2009 rates and a $33 million improvement in the 2009 prescription drug trend. In addition, an increase in the pharma revenue is projected to be offset by an increase in retention and assessments among all the carriers. The latter is primarily due to increases in projected assessments (NYS Insurance Department Assessment, Bad Debt and Charity Surcharge and Covered Lives Assessment) made through legislation. The projected loss for the Mental Health and Substance Abuse Program is primarily the result of a continued shift in services to higher cost non-participating providers as observed since the implementation of Timothy’s Law in 2007.
Historically, experience projections made by the insurance carriers in the 3rd Quarter Experience Report have been conservative compared to the actual experience.
2010 APPROVED PREMIUM RATES
Through aggressive premium negotiations with the Empire Plan carriers and the application of $410 million in dividend to all payors, The Empire Plan gross premium increased 5.5% while the net premium increased 3.36%. For the Excelsior Plan, the gross premium increased 6.0% while the net premium increased 3.8%. Exhibit II presents the approved 2010 Empire Plan and Excelsior Plan premium rates.
The low rates of increase provide for the necessary fiscal relief to NYSHIP Participating Agencies in 2010. While it is too early to accurately predict the 2011 premium rate change with any degree of certainty, we expect the 2011 increase to track more closely with actual Plan trend.
Consistent with the development of the 2009 premium rates, the 2010 premium rates exclude any margin in the rate development. In exchange, carriers agreed to a retrospective premium arrangement of approximately $253.3 million. If claims and expenses exceed the premium paid, an additional premium amount will be paid equal to either the amount of the claims and expenses in excess of the premium paid or $253.3 million, whichever is lower. At this time, we do not expect any retrospective premium payment for 2010 will be necessary.
Exhibit III presents The Empire Plan individual and family 5-tier billing rate history since 2001. Exhibit IV presents, for illustrative purposes only, the 2-tier rate history from 2001 to 2010.
2009 PROJECTED EMPIRE PLAN EXPERIENCE
In (000's)
BLUE CROSS HOSPITAL
|
UNITED HEALTHCARE MEDICAL Core
|
UNITED HEALTHCARE MEDICAL NY Enhancement
|
UNITED HEALTHCARE MEDICAL PA Enhancement
|
UNITED HEALTHCARE MEDICAL Combined
|
UHC MHSA Core
|
UHC MHSA NY Enhancement
|
UHC MHSA PA Enhancement
|
UHC MHSA Combined
|
UHC DRUG
|
TOTAL
|
|
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
(A) Premium (1) |
1,888,484
|
1,680,523
|
239,434
|
228,257
|
2,148,214
|
111,797
|
4,795
|
4,059
|
120,651
|
1,486,021
|
5,643,370
|
(B) Incurred Claims (2) |
1,717,876
|
1,517,502
|
214,758
|
210,124
|
1,942,384
|
103,806
|
3,646
|
3,305
|
110,757
|
1,344,243
|
5,115,260
|
(C) Administrative Expense (3) |
134,673
|
171,470
|
18,780
|
18,326
|
208,576
|
17,103
|
734
|
621
|
18,458
|
82,616
|
444,323
|
(D) Gain/(Loss) (A-B-C) |
35,935
|
(8,449)
|
5,896
|
(193)
|
(2,746)
|
(9,112)
|
415
|
133
|
(8,564)
|
59,162
|
83,787
|
(1) Earned Premium - Premium which pays for coverage for the period reported (accrual basis).
(2) Incurred Claims - Represents the cost of covered services provided during the period reported by the insurance company (accrual basis).
(3) Administrative Expenses - All charges by the insurance carrier other than for the payment of claims. Includes carrier’s cost to administer the program, interest charges, and other retention.
Source: Carriers 2009 3rd Quarter Experience Reports
Empire Plan
Participating Agency Premium Rates
Comparison of 2009 and 2010 Rates
Mediprime Rate Structure
EMPIRE PLAN
PLAN OPTION |
GROSS RATES (1) |
GROSS RATES (1) |
GROSS RATES (1) |
NET RATES (2) |
NET RATES (2) |
NET RATES (2) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Planprime: Individual |
630.73
|
660.24
|
4.3%
|
598.58
|
612.34
|
2.3%
|
Planprime: Family | 1,350.26 | 1,431.43 | 6.0% | 1,282.17 | 1,330.93 | 3.8% |
Medprime: Individual |
384.38
|
400.76
|
4.3%
|
359.22
|
367.37
|
2.3%
|
Medprime: Family - 1 medicare |
1,103.90
|
1,171.95
|
6.2%
|
1,042.81
|
1,085.94
|
4.1%
|
Medprime: Family - 2 medicares |
857.54
|
912.48
|
6.4%
|
803.45
|
840.98
|
4.7%
|
EXCELSIOR PLAN
PLAN OPTION |
GROSS RATES (1) |
GROSS RATES (1) |
GROSS RATES (1) |
NET RATES (2) |
NET RATES (2) |
NET RATES (2) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Planprime: Individual |
557.49
|
583.66
|
4.7%
|
529.17
|
541.71
|
2.4%
|
Planprime: Family | 1,197.21 | 1,271.13 | 6.2% | 1,137.16 | 1,183.09 | 4.0% |
Medprime: Individual |
320.35
|
338.64
|
5.7%
|
296.43
|
307.18
|
3.6%
|
Medprime: Family - 1 medicare |
960.08
|
1,026.09
|
6.9%
|
904.43
|
948.54
|
4.9%
|
Medprime: Family - 2 medicares |
722.95
|
781.06
|
8.0%
|
671.71
|
713.99
|
6.3%
|
(1) Represents premiums charged by the carriers.
(2) Represents cost to a participating agency.
EMPIRE PLAN
PA 5 TIER GROUP RATES
2001-2010 Monthly Rates
Individual Planprime
Year
|
Gross Rate (1)
|
% Change
|
Net Rate (2)
|
% Change
|
---|---|---|---|---|
2001 |
325.23
|
10.3%
|
314.26
|
9.7%
|
2002 |
353.81
|
8.8%
|
344.66
|
9.7%
|
2003 |
400.00
|
13.1%
|
384.89
|
11.7%
|
2004 |
448.00
|
12.0%
|
438.15
|
13.8%
|
2005 |
490.41
|
9.5%
|
478.49
|
9.2%
|
2006 |
547.86
|
11.7%
|
529.76
|
10.7%
|
2007 |
600.69
|
9.6%
|
564.84
|
6.6%
|
2008 |
633.79
|
5.5%
|
592.38
|
4.9%
|
2009 |
630.73
|
-0.5%
|
598.58
|
1.0%
|
2010 |
660.24
|
4.7%
|
612.34
|
2.3%
|
Average Percent Increase
Gross Rate % Change
|
Net Rate % Change
|
|
---|---|---|
From Inception of 5 Tier Structure (1996) |
7.8%
|
8.1%
|
Most Recent 10 Years |
8.5%
|
8.0%
|
Most Recent 5 Years |
6.2%
|
5.1%
|
Family Planprime
Year
|
Gross Rate (1)
|
% Change
|
Net Rate (2)
|
% Change
|
---|---|---|---|---|
2001 |
673.67
|
10.9%
|
651.09
|
10.3%
|
2002 |
742.98
|
10.3%
|
723.97
|
11.2%
|
2003 |
842.38
|
10.4%
|
811.41
|
12.1%
|
2004 |
945.29
|
12.2%
|
924.74
|
14.0%
|
2005 |
1,038.64
|
9.9%
|
1,013.68
|
9.6%
|
2006 |
1,164.16
|
12.1%
|
1,126.19
|
11.1%
|
2007 |
1,273.96
|
9.4%
|
1,198.07
|
6.4%
|
2008 |
1,346.27
|
5.7%
|
1,258.78
|
5.1%
|
2009 |
1,350.26
|
0.3%
|
1,282.17
|
1.9%
|
2010 |
1,431.43
|
6.0%
|
1,330.93
|
3.8%
|
Average Percent Increase
Gross Rate % Change
|
Net Rate % Change
|
|
---|---|---|
From Inception of 5 Tier Structure (1996) |
7.5%
|
7.7%
|
Most Recent 10 Years |
9.0%
|
8.5%
|
Most Recent 5 Years |
6.7%
|
5.6%
|
Individual Medprime
Year
|
Gross Rate (1)
|
% Change
|
Net Rate (2)
|
% Change
|
---|---|---|---|---|
2001 |
245.64
|
12.7%
|
239.94
|
12.0%
|
2002 |
259.96
|
5.8%
|
253.82
|
5.8%
|
2003 |
307.02
|
18.1%
|
297.50
|
17.2%
|
2004 |
341.87
|
11.4%
|
334.22
|
12.3%
|
2005 |
340.50
|
-0.4%
|
331.93
|
-0.7%
|
2006 |
359.35
|
5.5%
|
338.88
|
2.1%
|
2007 |
363.02
|
1.0%
|
333.18
|
-1.7%
|
2008 |
397.23
|
9.4%
|
360.41
|
8.2%
|
2009 |
384.38
|
-3.2%
|
359.22
|
-0.3%
|
2010 |
400.76
|
4.3%
|
367.37
|
2.3%
|
Average Percent Increase
Gross Rate % Change
|
Net Rate % Change
|
|
---|---|---|
From Inception of 5 Tier Structure (1996) |
4.9%
|
5.2%
|
Most Recent 10 Years |
6.5%
|
5.7%
|
Most Recent 5 Years |
3.4%
|
2.1%
|
Family - 1 Medprime
Year
|
Gross Rate (1)
|
% Change
|
Net Rate (2)
|
% Change
|
---|---|---|---|---|
2001 |
595.25
|
12.1%
|
577.95
|
11.5%
|
2002 |
649.14
|
9.1%
|
633.13
|
9.5%
|
2003 |
749.40
|
15.4%
|
724.05
|
14.4%
|
2004 |
839.18
|
12.0%
|
820.82
|
13.4%
|
2005 |
888.71
|
5.9%
|
867.09
|
5.6%
|
2006 |
975.66
|
9.8%
|
935.32
|
7.9%
|
2007 |
1,036.30
|
6.2%
|
966.44
|
3.3%
|
2008 |
1,109.74
|
7.1%
|
1,026.86
|
6.3%
|
2009 |
1,103.90
|
-0.5%
|
1,042.81
|
1.6%
|
2010 |
1,171.95
|
6.2%
|
1,085.94
|
4.1%
|
Average Percent Increase
Gross Rate % Change
|
Net Rate % Change
|
|
---|---|---|
From Inception of 5 Tier Structure (1996) |
6.2%
|
6.4%
|
Most Recent 10 Years |
8.3%
|
7.8%
|
Most Recent 5 Years |
5.7%
|
4.6%
|
Family - 2 or More Medprime
Year
|
Gross Rate (1)
|
% Change
|
Net Rate (2)
|
% Change
|
---|---|---|---|---|
2001 |
514.40
|
13.5%
|
502.37
|
12.8%
|
2002 |
555.29
|
7.9%
|
542.29
|
7.9%
|
2003 |
656.42
|
18.2%
|
636.67
|
17.4%
|
2004 |
733.05
|
11.7%
|
716.88
|
12.6%
|
2005 |
738.79
|
0.8%
|
720.53
|
0.5%
|
2006 |
787.16
|
6.5%
|
744.45
|
3.3%
|
2007 |
798.65
|
1.5%
|
734.81
|
-1.3%
|
2008 |
873.21
|
9.3%
|
794.94
|
8.2%
|
2009 |
857.54
|
-1.8%
|
803.45
|
1.1%
|
2010 |
912.48
|
6.4%
|
840.98
|
4.7%
|
Average Percent Increase
Gross Rate % Change
|
Net Rate % Change
|
|
---|---|---|
From Inception of 5 Tier Structure (1996) |
4.9%
|
5.3%
|
Most Recent 10 Years |
7.4%
|
6.7%
|
Most Recent 5 Years |
4.4%
|
3.2%
|
(1) Represents premiums paid to the carriers.
(2) Represents cost to a participating agency.
(3) Inception of Medprime Rate Structure.
EMPIRE PLAN
PA 2 TIER GROUP RATES
2001-2010 Monthly Rates
(For Illustrative Purposes Only)
Individual
Year
|
Gross Rate (1)
|
% Change
|
Net Rate (2)
|
% Change
|
---|---|---|---|---|
2001 |
289.41
|
11.0%
|
280.25
|
10.3%
|
2002 |
313.58
|
8.4%
|
305.67
|
9.1%
|
2003 |
357.44
|
14.0%
|
345.36
|
13.0%
|
2004 |
402.70
|
12.7%
|
394.31
|
14.2%
|
2005 |
433.70
|
7.7%
|
423.31
|
7.4%
|
2006 |
477.33
|
10.1%
|
459.25
|
8.5%
|
2007 |
511.23
|
7.1%
|
477.96
|
4.1%
|
2008 |
536.84
|
5.0%
|
498.88
|
4.4%
|
2009 |
527.09
|
-1.8%
|
497.91
|
-0.2%
|
2010 |
557.46
|
5.8%
|
515.75
|
3.6%
|
Average Percent Increase
Gross Rate % Change
|
Net Rate % Change
|
|
---|---|---|
From Inception (1986) |
7.6%
|
7.4%
|
Most Recent 10 Years |
8.0%
|
7.4%
|
Most Recent 5 Years |
5.2%
|
4.1%
|
Family
Year
|
Gross Rate (1)
|
% Change
|
Net Rate (2)
|
% Change
|
---|---|---|---|---|
2001 |
640.64
|
10.8%
|
619.28
|
10.0%
|
2002 |
703.61
|
9.8%
|
685.83
|
10.7%
|
2003 |
805.64
|
14.5%
|
778.82
|
13.6%
|
2004 |
899.98
|
11.7%
|
881.48
|
13.2%
|
2005 |
968.40
|
7.6%
|
945.11
|
7.2%
|
2006 |
1,073.28
|
10.8%
|
1,034.40
|
9.4%
|
2007 |
1,158.16
|
7.9%
|
1,084.90
|
4.9%
|
2008 |
1,233.38
|
6.5%
|
1,150.41
|
6.0%
|
2009 |
1,230.02
|
-0.3%
|
1,165.24
|
1.3%
|
2010 |
1,297.06
|
5.5%
|
1,203.56
|
3.3%
|
Average Percent Increase
Gross Rate % Change
|
Net Rate % Change
|
|
---|---|---|
From Inception (1986) |
8.1%
|
7.9%
|
Most Recent 10 Years |
8.5%
|
8.0%
|
Most Recent 5 Years |
6.1%
|
5.0%
|
(1) Represents premiums charged by the carriers.
(2) Represents cost to a participating agency.
Third Quarter – 2009
Dependent Eligibility Audit Update – Many PA Dependents May Lose NYSHIP Eligibility
Acceptable proof of eligibility has not been provided for over 20,000 dependents of Participating Agency enrollees as required by the NYSHIP Dependent Eligibility Verification Project. These dependents will lose eligibility for NYSHIP benefits on a retroactive basis if documentation is not provided soon. The Dependent Eligibility Verification Period which began on August 28th ended on November 25, 2009. This was the period during which enrollees were required to submit documentation of each dependent’s eligibility for coverage under NYSHIP.
In December, enrollees who failed to provide acceptable documentation by the due date received a notice from Budco, the firm administering the audit, advising them that unverified dependent will be removed from the enrollment file with an effective date of February 1, 2009 and enrollees will be responsible for claim payments made on behalf of ineligible dependents back to that date. They also were advised that they had a 30 day appeals period in which to provide proof of eligibility.
Please note the following key dates:
- Week of 1/11/10 – Each PA HBA was sent an agency-specific list of dependents not yet determined to be eligible to give HBAs an opportunity to reach out to enrollees covering those dependents.
- 1/15/10 – Budco’s review of proofs of eligibility ends.
- 1/19/10 – DCS will review documentation received through 3/12/10.
- Week of 2/8/10 – Each PA HBA will receive the final list of non-eligible dependents with the bill for March premium.
- 2/25/10 – All dependents of non-responders and dependents with incomplete documentation will be removed from eligibility on a retroactive basis effective February 1, 2009.
- 3/12/10 – The Dependent Eligibility Verification Project will end. After this date agency HBAs will be responsible for obtaining acceptable proof of eligibility and reinstating dependents for whom proof is provided. HBAs will receive a memo detailing reinstatement procedures prior to this date.
We encourage HBAs to reach out to enrollees with dependents for whom eligibility has not been documented, so that eligible dependents do not experience problems with accessing NYSHIP benefits and HBAs do not have the added workload of reinstating eligible dependents after the project is completed.
Medicare Part B Premium for 2010
For most Medicare beneficiaries, the standard monthly Medicare Part B premium for 2010 remains the same as it was in 2009 - $96.40. This is the result of a Federal hold harmless provision that prohibits an increase in the Medicare Part B premium in years when there is no cost of living adjustment in Social Security benefits. However, this provision does not apply to everyone. Individuals who are new to Medicare in 2010 or who did not receive Social Security benefits in 2009 will pay a standard monthly
Medicare Part B premium of $110.50 in 2010. Also, anyone subject to the Income Related Medicare Adjustment Amount (IRMAA) will have a premium increase for 2010. Civil Service Law requires NYSHIP Participating Agencies to reimburse enrollees the full cost of Medicare Part B coverage for both the enrollee and any dependents eligible for Medicare primary coverage. Please review your agency Medicare Part B premium reimbursement procedures to ensure that you are in compliance.
Extension of the ARRA COBRA Premium Reduction
The American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 (ARRA) was amended on December 19, 2009 by the Department of Defense Appropriations Act of 2010. As a result, the qualification period for and the duration of the Federal subsidy of COBRA premium under the ARRA were extended by three months and six months respectively. The original ARRA legislation provides for premium reductions for health benefits under COBRA through a Federal subsidy. Eligible individuals pay only 35 percent of their COBRA premiums. Employers must pay the 65% premium subsidy in the first instance, and then may withhold payroll tax payments to the U.S. Treasury to recover the premium advance. To qualify, individuals must experience a COBRA qualifying event that is the involuntary termination of a covered employee's employment.
Under the extension, the involuntary termination must occur during the period that began September 1, 2008 and ends on February 28, 2010 (formerly December 31, 2009). The premium reduction is now available for up to 15 months (formerly 9 months). Also, the amendment eliminates the requirement that COBRA eligibility occurs during the qualification period. For detailed information, including updated COBRA ARRA model notices refer to http://www.dol.gov/ebsa/COBRA.html.
Each NYSHIP Participating Agency is responsible for its own COBRA administration. Agencies with fewer than 20 employees should refer to memo PA09-11/PAEX 09-7.
Legislation Regarding Health Benefits for Volunteer Firefighters and EMTs
Legislation was passed in 2008 to allow emergency services volunteers to participate in public employee health insurance plans. The new law does not currently apply to NYSHIP since it did not amend Civil Service Law with regard to the eligibility of volunteers. In 2009 legislation was introduced to extend the change to NYSHIP. That bill was recently returned to the Assembly and currently sits in committee in both houses. The Fireman's Association of the State of New York (FASNY) keeps a handy scorecard on relevant legislation. The status of this particular bill can be checked at their website: http://www.fasny.com/legislation_issues-scorecard.aspx.
Pre-Tax Contribution Program (PTCP) and Domestic Partners
The Department has become aware of a clarification of the IRS rules regarding PTCP and premium paid for domestic partner coverage. As a result, effective January 1, 2010, State enrollees who are eligible for the PTCP and who cover a domestic partner will be able to have their full premium contribution for the cost of family health insurance coverage deducted from their employee wages before taxes are withheld. Formerly, State employees’ extra cost for domestic partner coverage could not be paid with pre-tax dollars. Participating Agencies should consult with their legal and/or tax advisors regarding the treatment of premiums for domestic partners.
GASB 45
The 2009 Buck Consultants report “Development of Recommended Actuarial Assumptions for New York State/SUNY GASB Valuation – Participating Agency Version” is available online at: http://www.cs.state.ny.us/gasb_pa/2008_NYS_GASB_45_Participating_Agencies.pdf.
As indicated in previous reports, NYSHIP will provide agency census reports upon request for use in complying with the provisions of GASB 45. Since the data included in these reports will be current at the time they are provided, it is important that your agency NYBEAS file is up-to-date, including correctly identifying and coding retirees before requesting census reports. To request a copy of your agency’s census information, please send an e-mail to: Kevin.Hill@cs.state.ny.us and include your name, agency name & code number, mailing address, phone number and e-mail address. For additional information about GASB 45, please refer to PA Memos 06-11 and 06-18.
Prompt Payment of NYSHIP Premium
As indicated in previous reports, the Employee Benefits Division has been aggressively monitoring agencies that fail to submit premium payments in a timely manner. This procedure includes suspension of claims for enrollees of any agency that falls three months behind in their premiums. To avoid disruption of your employees’ benefits, please be sure to submit your premium payments by the due date, as we must submit premium to the Empire Plan insurers on time. You may wish to consider submitting your payments electronically to promote timely payments. Attached are guidelines to initiate electronic transfer of funds.
Transmission of Reports Electronically
Many Participating Agencies have requested to receive the Empire Plan Experience Reports via e-mail. Beginning with this report, we are now offering all agencies the opportunity to have an easy access electronically through the following direct link to our website: http://www.cs.state.ny.us/ebd/ebdonlinecenter/pamarket/qer.cfm
CEO & HBA Name and Address Changes
Please be sure to notify EBD of any changes in the names and/or addresses (including e-mail address) of your agency’s CEO or HBA, so that we may keep our mailing lists up-to-date. This updated information should be sent to:
Debbie D’Orazio
NYS Department of Civil Service
Employee Benefits Division
Alfred E. Smith State Office Building
Albany, NY 12239
or E-mail: Deborah.Dorazio@cs.state.ny.us